↓ Skip to main content

A Research Note on Time With Children in Different- and Same-Sex Two-Parent Families

Overview of attention for article published in Demography, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
22 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
A Research Note on Time With Children in Different- and Same-Sex Two-Parent Families
Published in
Demography, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13524-015-0385-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kate C. Prickett, Alexa Martin-Storey, Robert Crosnoe

Abstract

Public debate on same-sex marriage often focuses on the disadvantages that children raised by same-sex couples may face. On one hand, little evidence suggests any difference in the outcomes of children raised by same-sex parents and different-sex parents. On the other hand, most studies are limited by problems of sample selection and size, and few directly measure the parenting practices thought to influence child development. This research note demonstrates how the 2003-2013 American Time Use Survey (n = 44,188) may help to address these limitations. Two-tier Cragg's Tobit alternative models estimated the amount of time that parents in different-sex and same-sex couples engaged in child-focused time. Women in same-sex couples were more likely than either women or men in different-sex couples to spend such time with children. Overall, women (regardless of the gender of their partners) and men coupled with other men spent significantly more time with children than men coupled with women, conditional on spending any child-focused time. These results support prior research that different-sex couples do not invest in children at appreciably different levels than same-sex couples. We highlight the potential for existing nationally representative data sets to provide preliminary insights into the developmental experiences of children in nontraditional families.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Unknown 68 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 17%
Student > Bachelor 12 17%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Professor 6 9%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 13 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 22 31%
Psychology 15 21%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 20 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2022.
All research outputs
#556,348
of 24,524,436 outputs
Outputs from Demography
#149
of 2,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,615
of 269,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Demography
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,524,436 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.