You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cardiac Rehabilitation in the United States
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.pcad.2013.09.018 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arthur R. Menezes, Carl J. Lavie, Richard V. Milani, Daniel E. Forman, Marjorie King, Mark A. Williams |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 162 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 10% |
| Researcher | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 38 | 23% |
| Unknown | 30 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 19% |
| Psychology | 10 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Unknown | 36 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2015.
All research outputs
#3,415,350
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases
#209
of 1,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,710
of 224,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases
#7
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.