Title |
Key techniques for 5G wireless communications: network architecture, physical layer, and MAC layer perspectives
|
---|---|
Published in |
Science China Information Sciences, February 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11432-015-5293-y |
Authors |
Zheng Ma, ZhengQuan Zhang, ZhiGuo Ding, PingZhi Fan, HengChao Li |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Turkey | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 208 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 23% |
Student > Master | 39 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 20 | 10% |
Researcher | 16 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 5% |
Other | 27 | 13% |
Unknown | 47 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 102 | 49% |
Computer Science | 48 | 23% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | <1% |
Environmental Science | 1 | <1% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | <1% |
Other | 6 | 3% |
Unknown | 49 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,453,753
of 25,263,619 outputs
Outputs from Science China Information Sciences
#29
of 274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,497
of 369,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science China Information Sciences
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,263,619 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them