| Title |
Urgency to rein in the gene-editing technology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Protein & Cell, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13238-015-0161-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiaoxue Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 13% |
| Japan | 3 | 10% |
| Peru | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 47% |
| Scientists | 10 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 30% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 15% |
| Unknown | 2 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 45% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 10% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 103. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2019.
All research outputs
#394,017
of 24,715,720 outputs
Outputs from Protein & Cell
#17
of 801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,359
of 269,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Protein & Cell
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,715,720 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.