↓ Skip to main content

Adults’ and children’s monitoring of story events in the service of comprehension

Overview of attention for article published in Memory & Cognition, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Adults’ and children’s monitoring of story events in the service of comprehension
Published in
Memory & Cognition, May 2011
DOI 10.3758/s13421-011-0085-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine M. Bohn-Gettler, David N. Rapp, Paul van den Broek, Panayiota Kendeou, Mary Jane White

Abstract

When reading narratives, adults monitor shifts in time, space, characters, goals, and causation. Shifts in any of these dimensions affect both moment-by-moment reading and memory organization. The extant developmental literature suggests that middle school children have relatively sophisticated understandings of each of these dimensions but does not indicate whether they spontaneously monitor these dimensions during reading experiences. In four experiments, we examined the processing of event shifts by adults and children, using both an explicit verb-clustering task and a reading time task. The results indicate that middle school children's and adults' post-reading memory is organized using these dimensions but that children do not monitor dimensions during moment-by-moment reading in the same manner as adults. These differences were not a function of differentially difficult texts for children and adults, or between-group differences. The findings have implications for models of adult and child text processing and for understanding children's developing narrative comprehension.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 64 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 33%
Student > Master 9 14%
Researcher 5 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 6 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 27 41%
Social Sciences 10 15%
Linguistics 7 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 8 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2016.
All research outputs
#15,236,094
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Memory & Cognition
#945
of 1,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,325
of 109,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory & Cognition
#7
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,568 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.