| Title |
Weeds for bees? A review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Agronomy for Sustainable Development, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13593-015-0302-5 |
| Authors |
Vincent Bretagnolle, Sabrina Gaba |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 119 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 29 | 24% |
| United States | 6 | 5% |
| France | 6 | 5% |
| Australia | 4 | 3% |
| Belgium | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Guinea | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 63 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 104 | 87% |
| Scientists | 14 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 474 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 461 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 83 | 18% |
| Researcher | 82 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 82 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 71 | 15% |
| Unknown | 89 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 249 | 53% |
| Environmental Science | 67 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Engineering | 7 | 1% |
| Other | 29 | 6% |
| Unknown | 104 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2020.
All research outputs
#460,430
of 25,880,422 outputs
Outputs from Agronomy for Sustainable Development
#22
of 890 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,099
of 282,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Agronomy for Sustainable Development
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,880,422 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 890 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.