| Title |
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Influencing micropropagation in Clitoria ternatea L. through the manipulation of TDZ levels and use of different explant types
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12298-012-0136-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Seemab Mukhtar, Naseem Ahmad, Md Imran Khan, Mohammad Anis, Ibrahim M. Aref |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Turkey | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 20% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 6 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 64% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2016.
All research outputs
#4,676,546
of 22,800,560 outputs
Outputs from Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants
#28
of 413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,920
of 170,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,800,560 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 413 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them