↓ Skip to main content

In vitro antimicrobial studies of silver carbene complexes: activity of free and nanoparticle carbene formulations against clinical isolates of pathogenic bacteria

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC), October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
137 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In vitro antimicrobial studies of silver carbene complexes: activity of free and nanoparticle carbene formulations against clinical isolates of pathogenic bacteria
Published in
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC), October 2011
DOI 10.1093/jac/dkr408
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeff G. Leid, Andrew J. Ditto, Amanda Knapp, Parth N. Shah, Brian D. Wright, Robyn Blust, Lanette Christensen, C. B. Clemons, J. P. Wilber, Gerald W. Young, Ae Gyeong Kang, Matthew J. Panzner, Carolyn L. Cannon, Yang H. Yun, Wiley J. Youngs, Nicole M. Seckinger, Emily K. Cope

Abstract

Silver carbenes may represent novel, broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents that have low toxicity while providing varying chemistry for targeted applications. Here, the bactericidal activity of four silver carbene complexes (SCCs) with different formulations, including nanoparticles (NPs) and micelles, was tested against a panel of clinical strains of bacteria and fungi that are the causative agents of many skin and soft tissue, respiratory, wound, blood, and nosocomial infections.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 145 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 19%
Researcher 24 16%
Student > Master 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 24 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 16%
Chemistry 21 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 7%
Other 33 22%
Unknown 26 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2013.
All research outputs
#3,274,998
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC)
#1,264
of 8,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,087
of 144,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC)
#10
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.