↓ Skip to main content

Magnetogenetic Control of Protein Gradients Inside Living Cells with High Spatial and Temporal Resolution

Overview of attention for article published in Nano Letters, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Magnetogenetic Control of Protein Gradients Inside Living Cells with High Spatial and Temporal Resolution
Published in
Nano Letters, April 2015
DOI 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00851
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fred Etoc, Chiara Vicario, Domenik Lisse, Jean-Michel Siaugue, Jacob Piehler, Mathieu Coppey, Maxime Dahan

Abstract

Tools for controlling the spatial organization of proteins are a major prerequisite for deciphering mechanisms governing the dynamic architecture of living cells. Here we have developed a generic approach for inducing and maintaining protein gradients inside living cells by means of biofunctionalized magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs). For this purpose, we tailored the size and surface properties of MNPs in order to ensure unhindered mobility in the cytosol. These MNPs with a core diameter below 50 nm could be rapidly relocalized in living cells by exploiting biased diffusion at weak magnetic forces in the femto-Newton range. In combination with MNP surface functionalization for specific in situ capturing of target proteins as well as efficient delivery into the cytosplasm, we here present a comprehensive technology for controlling intracellular protein gradients with a temporal resolution of a few tens of seconds.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 110 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 28%
Student > Master 17 15%
Researcher 13 12%
Professor 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 21 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 18%
Physics and Astronomy 13 12%
Chemistry 10 9%
Engineering 7 6%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 22 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2017.
All research outputs
#7,400,888
of 22,800,560 outputs
Outputs from Nano Letters
#5,975
of 12,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,016
of 264,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nano Letters
#117
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,800,560 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,371 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.