| Title |
Impact of closed versus open tracheal suctioning systems for mechanically ventilated adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-014-3565-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Akira Kuriyama, Noriyuki Umakoshi, Jun Fujinaga, Tadaaki Takada |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 92 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 16% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 12% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 20 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 32% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 22 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2020.
All research outputs
#837,015
of 22,800,560 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#791
of 4,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,903
of 362,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#4
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,800,560 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,981 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.