↓ Skip to main content

Extension of coarse-grained UNRES force field to treat carbon nanotubes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Modeling, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Extension of coarse-grained UNRES force field to treat carbon nanotubes
Published in
Journal of Molecular Modeling, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00894-018-3656-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam K. Sieradzan, Magdalena A. Mozolewska

Abstract

Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have recently received considerable attention because of their possible applications in various branches of nanotechnology. For their cogent application, knowledge of their interactions with biological macromolecules, especially proteins, is essential and computer simulations are very useful for such studies. Classical all-atom force fields limit simulation time scale and size of the systems significantly. Therefore, in this work, we implemented CNTs into the coarse-grained UNited RESidue (UNRES) force field. A CNT is represented as a rigid infinite-length cylinder which interacts with a protein through the Kihara potential. Energy conservation in microcanonical coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations and temperature conservation in canonical simulations with UNRES containing the CNT component have been verified. Subsequently, studies of three proteins, bovine serum albumin (BSA), soybean peroxidase (SBP), and α-chymotrypsin (CT), with and without CNTs, were performed to examine the influence of CNTs on the structure and dynamics of these proteins. It was found that nanotubes bind to these proteins and influence their structure. Our results show that the UNRES force field can be used for further studies of CNT-protein systems with 3-4 order of magnitude larger timescale than using regular all-atom force fields. Graphical abstract Bovine serum albumin (BSA), soybean peroxidase (SBP), and α-chymotrypsin (CT), with and without CNTsᅟ.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%
Physics and Astronomy 1 14%
Materials Science 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2018.
All research outputs
#16,452,494
of 24,226,848 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Modeling
#433
of 865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,090
of 330,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Modeling
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,226,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 865 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.