↓ Skip to main content

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Fetal methotrexate syndrome and Antley–Bixler syndrome should not be confused

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Radiology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Fetal methotrexate syndrome and Antley–Bixler syndrome should not be confused
Published in
Pediatric Radiology, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00247-018-4125-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Richards, Christine M. Hall, D. Johnson, Amaka C. Offiah

Abstract

Exposure to methotrexate in utero can result in fetal methotrexate syndrome - a condition characterised by prenatal-onset growth retardation, craniosynostosis, dysmorphic facies and multiple limb abnormalities. A literature review was prompted by the findings in a girl who is presented here with full consent from her guardian. She is the third child of unrelated parents and was 4 years old at the time of this report. Her mother took 15 mg methotrexate on two occasions during early pregnancy for juvenile idiopathic arthritis, unaware that she was pregnant. This case exhibits many of the classic features of fetal methotrexate syndrome as well as radiohumeral synostosis, which has not previously been described in fetal methotrexate syndrome. The combination of craniosynostosis and radiohumeral synostosis raised the possibility of Antley-Bixler syndrome. Steroid profile (for Antley-Bixler syndrome) and genetic testing for craniosynostosis syndromes (including Antley-Bixler syndrome) were negative, as was microarray, so it was concluded that her deformities, including radiohumeral synostosis, were from methotrexate teratogenicity. Clinicians should not mistake fetal methotrexate syndrome with Antley-Bixler syndrome. Caution when administering teratogens to women of child-bearing age and robust contraceptive and family-planning advice are warranted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 100%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 1 100%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2018.
All research outputs
#20,483,282
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Radiology
#1,768
of 2,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,448
of 327,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Radiology
#36
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,095 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.