You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of a Susceptibility Gene for Schizophrenia: Genotype Based Meta-Analysis of RGS4 Polymorphisms from Thirteen Independent Samples
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Psychiatry, April 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.02.015 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael E. Talkowski, Howard Seltman, Anne S. Bassett, Linda M. Brzustowicz, Xiangning Chen, Kodavali V. Chowdari, David A. Collier, Quirino Cordeiro, Aiden P. Corvin, Smita N. Deshpande, Michael F. Egan, Michael Gill, Kenneth S. Kendler, George Kirov, Leonard L. Heston, Pat Levitt, David A. Lewis, Tao Li, Karoly Mirnics, Derek W. Morris, Nadine Norton, Michael C. O'Donovan, Michael J. Owen, Christian Richard, Prachi Semwal, Janet L. Sobell, David St Clair, Richard E. Straub, B.K. Thelma, Homero Vallada, Daniel R. Weinberger, Nigel M. Williams, Joel Wood, Feng Zhang, Bernie Devlin, Vishwajit L. Nimgaonkar |
| Abstract |
Associations between schizophrenia (SCZ) and polymorphisms at the regulator of G-protein signaling 4 (RGS4) gene have been reported (single nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs] 1, 4, 7, and 18). Yet, similar to other SCZ candidate genes, studies have been inconsistent with respect to the associated alleles. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 200% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Cuba | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Greece | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 69 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 19% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
| Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 19% |
| Unknown | 10 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 17% |
| Psychology | 9 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2011.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Biological Psychiatry
#5,787
of 6,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,281
of 84,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Psychiatry
#37
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,597 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.