↓ Skip to main content

Simultaneous determination of 40 novel psychoactive stimulants in urine by liquid chromatography–high resolution mass spectrometry and library matching

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chromatography A, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Simultaneous determination of 40 novel psychoactive stimulants in urine by liquid chromatography–high resolution mass spectrometry and library matching
Published in
Journal of Chromatography A, April 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.04.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marta Concheiro, Marisol Castaneto, Robert Kronstrand, Marilyn A. Huestis

Abstract

The emergence of novel psychoactive substances is an ongoing challenge for analytical toxicologists. Different analogs are continuously introduced in the market to circumvent legislation and to enhance their pharmacological activity. Although detection of drugs in blood indicates recent exposure and link intoxication to the causative agent, urine is still the most preferred testing matrix in clinical and forensic settings. We developed a method for the simultaneous quantification of 8 piperazines, 4 designer amphetamines and 28 synthetic cathinones and 4 metabolites, in urine by liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS). Data were acquired in full scan and data dependent MS(2) mode. Compounds were quantified by precursor ion exact mass, and confirmed by product ion spectra library matching, taking into account product ions' exact mass and intensities. One-hundred μL urine was subjected to solid phase cation exchange extraction (SOLA SCX). The chromatographic reverse-phase separation was achieved with gradient mobile phase of 0.1% formic acid in water and in acetonitrile in 20min. The assay was linear from 2.5 or 5 to 500μg/L. Imprecision (n=15) was <15.4%, and accuracy (n=15) 84.2-118.5%. Extraction efficiency was 51.2-111.2%, process efficiency 57.7-104.9% and matrix effect ranged from -41.9% to 238.5% (CV<23.3%, except MDBZP CV<34%). Authentic urine specimens (n=62) were analyzed with the method that provides a comprehensive confirmation for 40 new stimulant drugs with specificity and sensitivity.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 98 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Student > Bachelor 14 14%
Student > Master 13 13%
Researcher 11 11%
Other 8 8%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 21 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 29 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 30 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2016.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chromatography A
#2,839
of 12,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,965
of 283,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chromatography A
#18
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,075 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.