↓ Skip to main content

The effect of leg compression garments on the mechanical characteristics and performance of single-leg hopping in healthy male volunteers

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
The effect of leg compression garments on the mechanical characteristics and performance of single-leg hopping in healthy male volunteers
Published in
BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13102-015-0005-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amitabh Gupta, Joshua John Bryers, Peter James Clothier

Abstract

Compression garments (CG) are commonly used by athletes to improve motor performance and recovery during or following exercise. Numerous studies have investigated the effect of CG on physiological and physical parameters with variable results as to their efficacy. A possible effect of commercially available CG may be to induce a change in leg mechanical characteristics during repetitive tasks to fatigue. This investigation determined the effect of CG on performance and vertical stiffness during single-leg-hopping to exhaustion. Thirty-eight healthy, male participants, mean (SD) 22.1 (2.8) years of age performed single-leg hopping at 2.2 Hz to volitional exhaustion with a CG, without CG and with a sham. Differences in total duration of hopping (1-way repeated ANOVA) and dependant variables for the start and end periods (2-way repeated ANOVA) including duration of flight (tf), loading (tl) and contact (tc) phases, vertical height displacement during flight (zf) and loading (zl) phases, normalised peak vertical ground reaction force (FzN) and normalised vertical stiffness (k N), were determined. Bonferroni correction was performed to reduce the risk of type 1 error. There was no significant difference (p = 0.73) in the total duration of hopping between conditions (CG (mean (SD)) 89.6 (36.3) s; without CG 88.5 (27.5) s; sham 91.3 (27.7) s). There were no significant differences between conditions for spatiotemporal or kinetic characteristics (p > 0.05). From the start to the end periods there was no significant difference in tl (p = 0.15), significant decrease in tf (p < 0.001), zf and zl (p < 0.001) and increase in tc (p < 0.001). There was also a significant increase in k N from start to end periods (p < 0.01) ranging from 9.6 to 14.2%. This study demonstrates that commercially available CG did not induce a change in spatiotemporal or vertical stiffness during a fatiguing task. The finding that vertical stiffness increased towards the end of the task, while hopping frequency and duration of loading were maintained, may indicate that there was an alteration to the motor control strategy as fatigue approached. Current Controlled Trials ACTRN12615000240549. Registered 17 March 2015.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 58 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 20%
Student > Master 8 14%
Lecturer 4 7%
Professor 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 10 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 25 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Engineering 4 7%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 14 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2015.
All research outputs
#18,409,030
of 22,803,211 outputs
Outputs from BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
#414
of 497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,441
of 265,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,803,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.