You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The role of benefit transfer in ecosystem service valuation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Economics, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.02.018 |
| Authors |
Leslie Richardson, John Loomis, Timm Kroeger, Frank Casey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 486 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Mozambique | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 473 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 104 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 86 | 18% |
| Researcher | 81 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 31 | 6% |
| Other | 66 | 14% |
| Unknown | 84 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 154 | 32% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 83 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 27 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 46 | 9% |
| Unknown | 114 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,760,016
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Economics
#762
of 4,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,979
of 277,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Economics
#7
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,408 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.