↓ Skip to main content

Heterogeneity Underlies the Emergence of EGFRT790 Wild-Type Clones Following Treatment of T790M-Positive Cancers with a Third-Generation EGFR Inhibitor

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Discovery, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
26 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
427 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Heterogeneity Underlies the Emergence of EGFRT790 Wild-Type Clones Following Treatment of T790M-Positive Cancers with a Third-Generation EGFR Inhibitor
Published in
Cancer Discovery, July 2015
DOI 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-15-0399
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zofia Piotrowska, Matthew J. Niederst, Chris A. Karlovich, Heather A. Wakelee, Joel W. Neal, Mari Mino-Kenudson, Linnea Fulton, Aaron N. Hata, Elizabeth L. Lockerman, Anuj Kalsy, Subba Digumarthy, Alona Muzikansky, Mitch Raponi, Angel R. Garcia, Hillary E. Mulvey, Melissa K. Parks, Richard H. DiCecca, Dora Dias-Santagata, A. John Iafrate, Alice T. Shaw, Andrew R. Allen, Jeffrey A. Engelman, Lecia V. Sequist

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 241 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 55 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 15%
Other 27 11%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Student > Master 19 8%
Other 36 15%
Unknown 52 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 58 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 3%
Chemistry 4 2%
Other 10 4%
Unknown 66 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2018.
All research outputs
#2,298,133
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Discovery
#1,007
of 4,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,054
of 279,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Discovery
#12
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.