↓ Skip to main content

食用きのこ増産用パルス高電圧発生装置の開発とその効果の検証

Overview of attention for article published in JOURNAL of the JAPANESE SOCIETY of AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
食用きのこ増産用パルス高電圧発生装置の開発とその効果の検証
Published in
JOURNAL of the JAPANESE SOCIETY of AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY, November 2012
DOI 10.11357/jsam.74.483
Authors

高木 浩一, 齋藤 達也, 日下 智博, 坂本 裕一, 高橋 久祐, 成松 眞樹, 長根 健一, 山口 諒

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,360,834
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL of the JAPANESE SOCIETY of AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY
#3
of 74 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,751
of 202,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL of the JAPANESE SOCIETY of AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 74 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them