| Title |
What Types of Evidence are Most Needed to Advance Behavioral Medicine?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, February 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12160-007-9008-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Russell E. Glasgow |
| Abstract |
This editorial presents a perspective on the types of evidence most needed to advance behavioral medicine given the current status of the field. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 78 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 26% |
| Researcher | 17 | 20% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 7 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 21 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 21% |
| Psychology | 17 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 17% |