↓ Skip to main content

The origins of reproductive isolation in plants

Overview of attention for article published in New Phytologist, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
34 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
306 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
431 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The origins of reproductive isolation in plants
Published in
New Phytologist, May 2015
DOI 10.1111/nph.13424
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric Baack, Maria Clara Melo, Loren H Rieseberg, Daniel Ortiz-Barrientos

Abstract

I. II. III. IV. V. VI. References SUMMARY: Reproductive isolation in plants occurs through multiple barriers that restrict gene flow between populations, but their origins remain uncertain. Work in the past decade has shown that postpollination barriers, such as the failure to form hybrid seeds or sterility of hybrid offspring, are often less strong than prepollination barriers. Evidence implicates multiple evolutionary forces in the origins of reproductive barriers, including mutation, stochastic processes and natural selection. Although adaptation to different environments is a common element of reproductive isolation, genomic conflicts also play a role, including female meiotic drive. The genetic basis of some reproductive barriers, particularly flower colour influencing pollinator behaviour, is well understood in some species, but the genetic changes underlying many other barriers, especially pollen-stylar interactions, are largely unknown. Postpollination barriers appear to accumulate at a faster rate in annuals compared with perennials, due in part to chromosomal rearrangements. Chromosomal changes can be important isolating barriers in themselves but may also reduce the recombination of genes contributing to isolation. Important questions for the next decade include identifying the evolutionary forces responsible for chromosomal rearrangements, determining how often prezygotic barriers arise due to selection against hybrids, and establishing the relative importance of genomic conflicts in speciation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 431 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 414 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 105 24%
Researcher 77 18%
Student > Master 46 11%
Student > Bachelor 45 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 7%
Other 62 14%
Unknown 65 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 260 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 60 14%
Environmental Science 21 5%
Computer Science 2 <1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 <1%
Other 11 3%
Unknown 75 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,077,171
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from New Phytologist
#783
of 9,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,925
of 279,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New Phytologist
#5
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,727 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.