↓ Skip to main content

Continuous transfer of liquid metal droplets across a fluid–fluid interface within an integrated microfluidic chip

Overview of attention for article published in Lab on a Chip - Miniaturisation for Chemistry & Biology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Continuous transfer of liquid metal droplets across a fluid–fluid interface within an integrated microfluidic chip
Published in
Lab on a Chip - Miniaturisation for Chemistry & Biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1039/c5lc00415b
Pubmed ID
Authors

Berrak Gol, Francisco J. Tovar-Lopez, Michael E. Kurdzinski, Shi-Yang Tang, Phred Petersen, Arnan Mitchell, Khashayar Khoshmanesh

Abstract

Micro scale liquid metal droplets have been hailed as the potential key building blocks of future micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS). However, most of the current liquid metal enabled systems involve millimeter scale droplets, which are manually injected onto the desired locations of the microchip. Despite its simplicity, this method is impractical for patterning large arrays or complex systems based on micro scale droplets. Here, we present a microfluidic chip, which integrates continuous generation of micro scale galinstan droplets in glycerol, and the hydrodynamic transfer of these droplets into sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution. Observation via high-speed imaging along with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis are utilised to comprehend the lateral migration of droplets from the glycerol to NaOH fluid. This platform is simple, can be readily integrated into other microfluidic systems, and creates flexibility by separating the continuous phase for droplet generation from the eventual target carrier fluid within a monolithic chip.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
China 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 63 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 37%
Student > Master 13 19%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 2 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 38 57%
Materials Science 6 9%
Physics and Astronomy 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Chemical Engineering 2 3%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 6 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2015.
All research outputs
#16,997,104
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from Lab on a Chip - Miniaturisation for Chemistry & Biology
#4,513
of 5,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,345
of 361,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lab on a Chip - Miniaturisation for Chemistry & Biology
#302
of 505 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,997 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 505 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.