↓ Skip to main content

Contextual Influences on Men’s Perceptions of Women’s Sexual Interest

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Contextual Influences on Men’s Perceptions of Women’s Sexual Interest
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10508-015-0539-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Teresa A. Treat, Richard J. Viken, Sharday Summers

Abstract

The current study evaluated whether the sexual relevance of the social environment potentiated men's judgments of women's sexual interest, particularly among men reporting more frequent misperception of a potential partner's sexual interest. Twenty-eight scenes were constructed depicting social environments that were either lower or higher in sexual relevance (e.g., office vs. bar). A full-body photograph of one of 14 college-aged women was inserted into each scene; the women all expressed neutral-to-positive affect and varied in provocativeness of dress and attractiveness. A total of 237 undergraduate males viewed each scene and judged how sexually interested and friendly each woman felt. Sexually relevant social environments potentiated men's judgments of women's sexual interest far more than their friendliness. This effect was stronger among more conservatively dressed women and among men reporting more frequent experiences of misperceiving a woman's sexual interest. The findings highlight the contextualized nature of emotional perception, whereby perception of emotion is potentiated in congruent, relative to incongruent, contexts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 14%
Researcher 5 14%
Other 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 19 53%
Social Sciences 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2016.
All research outputs
#3,538,345
of 22,803,211 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#1,312
of 3,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,067
of 264,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#21
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,803,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.