↓ Skip to main content

Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: Reduction of Medication Use After Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy with an Internal Myofascial Trigger Point Wand

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 355)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
Title
Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: Reduction of Medication Use After Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy with an Internal Myofascial Trigger Point Wand
Published in
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10484-015-9273-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rodney U. Anderson, Richard H. Harvey, David Wise, J. Nevin Smith, Brian H. Nathanson, Tim Sawyer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 124 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 19%
Researcher 7 6%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Student > Bachelor 6 5%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 31 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 40 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 25%
Psychology 4 3%
Sports and Recreations 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 37 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 105. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2016.
All research outputs
#361,670
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
#8
of 355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,427
of 257,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them