↓ Skip to main content

Effects of norepinephrine on renal perfusion, filtration and oxygenation in vasodilatory shock and acute kidney injury

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
Title
Effects of norepinephrine on renal perfusion, filtration and oxygenation in vasodilatory shock and acute kidney injury
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00134-010-2057-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bengt Redfors, Gudrun Bragadottir, Johan Sellgren, Kristina Swärd, Sven-Erik Ricksten

Abstract

The use of norepinephrine (NE) in patients with volume-resuscitated vasodilatory shock and acute kidney injury (AKI) remains the subject of much debate and controversy. The effects of NE-induced variations in mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) on renal blood flow (RBF), oxygen delivery (RDO(2)), glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and the renal oxygen supply/demand relationship (renal oxygenation) in vasodilatory shock with AKI have not been previously studied.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Russia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 111 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 18 16%
Other 15 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 13%
Researcher 14 12%
Professor 10 9%
Other 29 25%
Unknown 15 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 70%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 19 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,359,542
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,169
of 4,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,702
of 98,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.