↓ Skip to main content

Performance of one-view breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone breast cancer screening modality: results from the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial, a population-based study

Overview of attention for article published in European Radiology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 5,098)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
11 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
244 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
244 Mendeley
Title
Performance of one-view breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone breast cancer screening modality: results from the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial, a population-based study
Published in
European Radiology, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00330-015-3803-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristina Lång, Ingvar Andersson, Aldana Rosso, Anders Tingberg, Pontus Timberg, Sophia Zackrisson

Abstract

To assess the performance of one-view digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in breast cancer screening. The Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial is a prospective population-based one-arm study with a planned inclusion of 15000 participants; a random sample of women aged 40-74 years eligible for the screening programme. This is an explorative analysis of the first half of the study population (n = 7500). Participants underwent one-view DBT and two-view digital mammography (DM), with independent double reading and scoring. Primary outcome measures were detection rate, recall rate and positive predictive value (PPV). McNemar's test with 95 % confidence intervals was used. Breast cancer was found in sixty-eight women. Of these, 46 cases were detected by both modalities, 21 by DBT alone and one by DM alone. The detection rate for one-view DBT was 8.9/1000 screens (95 % CI 6.9 to 11.3) and 6.3/1000 screens (4.6 to 8.3) for two-view DM (p < 0.0001). The recall rate after arbitration was 3.8 % (3.3 to 4.2) for DBT and 2.6 % (2.3 to 3.0) for DM (p < 0.0001). The PPV was 24 % for both DBT and DM. Our results suggest that one-view DBT might be feasible as a stand-alone screening modality. • One-view DBT as a stand-alone breast cancer screening modality has not been investigated. • One-view DBT increased the cancer detection rate significantly. • The recall rate increased significantly but was still low. • Breast cancer screening with one-view DBT as a stand-alone modality seems feasible.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 240 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 49 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 12%
Student > Master 23 9%
Student > Bachelor 23 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 54 22%
Unknown 51 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 9%
Physics and Astronomy 19 8%
Engineering 15 6%
Unspecified 5 2%
Other 33 14%
Unknown 68 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 101. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2019.
All research outputs
#426,267
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#20
of 5,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,610
of 282,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#1
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,098 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.