| Title |
The European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry and Molar Incisor Hypomineralisation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40368-015-0189-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
K. Weerheijm |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 21% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 20 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 60% |
| Unknown | 21 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2015.
All research outputs
#18,372,841
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry
#206
of 280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,465
of 264,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 280 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.