↓ Skip to main content

A Simple and Reliable Method for Intracorporeal Circular-Stapled Esophagojejunostomy Using a Hand-Sewn Over-and-Over Suture Technique in Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
A Simple and Reliable Method for Intracorporeal Circular-Stapled Esophagojejunostomy Using a Hand-Sewn Over-and-Over Suture Technique in Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, May 2015
DOI 10.1245/s10434-015-4541-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takeru Matsuda, Takeshi Iwasaki, Masaaki Mitsutsuji, Kenro Hirata, Daisuke Tsugawa, Yutaka Sugita, Etsuji Shimada, Yoshihiro Kakeji

Abstract

The controversy regarding laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) is mainly due to the difficulty associated with esophagojejunostomy during this procedure. Although several techniques have so far been reported to overcome this issue,1 (-) 4 a reliable technique has not yet been established. We developed intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy using a circular stapler in LTG with a hand-sewn over-and-over suture technique, and have shown its favorable outcomes compared with those of conventional open surgery.5 This technique is presented in the video. After transection of the esophagus, an over-and-over suture with a 2-0 monofilament is placed counterclockwise from the right to the left side of the cut end in an outside-to-inside direction, and then from the left to the right side in an inside-to-outside direction. After insertion of the anvil head into the esophagus, it was fixed by ligation of the thread. Finally, intracorporeal esophagojejunal anastomosis was performed using a circular stapler. In LTG, reconstruction using this method was performed for 23 consecutive patients with gastric cancer. There were no serious intraoperative complications or need for conversion to open surgery. Anastomotic leakage and stenosis occurred in one case each, respectively. The mean time for fixation of the anvil to the esophagus was 15 min for the last 12 consecutive patients. This method is simple and feasible, and the advantage of this technique is the elimination of the backhand stroke throughout the suturing procedure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Peru 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 3 23%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 77%
Unknown 3 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2015.
All research outputs
#20,271,607
of 22,803,211 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#5,490
of 6,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,641
of 264,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#52
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,803,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.