You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Pediatric Imaging, Neurocognition, and Genetics (PING) Data Repository
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
NeuroImage, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.057 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Terry L. Jernigan, Timothy T. Brown, Donald J. Hagler, Natacha Akshoomoff, Hauke Bartsch, Erik Newman, Wesley K. Thompson, Cinnamon S. Bloss, Sarah S. Murray, Nicholas Schork, David N. Kennedy, Joshua M. Kuperman, Connor McCabe, Yoonho Chung, Ondrej Libiger, Melanie Maddox, B.J. Casey, Linda Chang, Thomas M. Ernst, Jean A. Frazier, Jeffrey R. Gruen, Elizabeth R. Sowell, Tal Kenet, Walter E. Kaufmann, Stewart Mostofsky, David G. Amaral, Anders M. Dale, Neurocognition and Genetics Study for the Pediatric Imaging |
| Abstract |
The main objective of the multi-site Pediatric Imaging, Neurocognition, and Genetics (PING) study was to create a large repository of standardized measurements of behavioral and imaging phenotypes accompanied by whole genome genotyping acquired from typically-developing children varying widely in age (3 to 20years). This cross-sectional study produced sharable data from 1493 children, and these data have been described in several publications focusing on brain and cognitive development. Researchers may gain access to these data by applying for an account on the PING Portal and filing a Data Use Agreement. Here we describe the recruiting and screening of the children and give a brief overview of the assessments performed, the imaging methods applied, the genetic data produced, and the numbers of cases for whom different data types are available. We also cite sources of more detailed information about the methods and data. Finally we describe the procedures for accessing the data and for using the PING data exploration portal. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 75% |
| Norway | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Cuba | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 241 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 54 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 8% |
| Professor | 16 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 51 | 20% |
| Unknown | 50 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 51 | 20% |
| Psychology | 40 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 18 | 7% |
| Engineering | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 39 | 16% |
| Unknown | 66 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2019.
All research outputs
#6,496,331
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from NeuroImage
#5,180
of 12,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,253
of 278,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroImage
#82
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,205 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.