↓ Skip to main content

Multisystemic Therapy Improves the Patient-Provider Relationship in Families of Adolescents with Poorly Controlled Insulin Dependent Diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
Multisystemic Therapy Improves the Patient-Provider Relationship in Families of Adolescents with Poorly Controlled Insulin Dependent Diabetes
Published in
Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10880-015-9422-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

April Idalski Carcone, Deborah A. Ellis, Xinguang Chen, Sylvie Naar, Phillippe B. Cunningham, Kathleen Moltz

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine if multisystemic therapy (MST), an intensive, home and community-based family treatment, significantly improved patient-provider relationships in families where youth had chronic poor glycemic control. One hundred forty-six adolescents with type 1 or 2 diabetes in chronic poor glycemic control (HbA1c ≥8 %) and their primary caregivers were randomly assigned to MST or a telephone support condition. Caregiver perceptions of their relationship with the diabetes multidisciplinary medical team were assessed at baseline and treatment termination with the Measure of Process of Care-20. At treatment termination, MST families reported significant improvement on the Coordinated and Comprehensive Care scale and marginally significant improvement on the Respectful and Supportive Care scale. Improvements on the Enabling and Partnership and Providing Specific Information scales were not significant. Results suggest MST improves the ability of the families and the diabetes treatment providers to work together.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
Morocco 1 1%
Unknown 85 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 15%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 20 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 17%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Philosophy 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 25 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2015.
All research outputs
#20,271,607
of 22,803,211 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
#407
of 441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,668
of 264,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,803,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.