Title |
Nighttime lights and population changes in Europe 1992–2012
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ambio, March 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s13280-015-0646-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maria Francisca Archila Bustos, Ola Hall, Magnus Andersson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 58 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 17% |
Researcher | 7 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
Other | 10 | 17% |
Unknown | 17 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 9 | 15% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 12% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 10% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 8% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 14% |
Unknown | 20 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2015.
All research outputs
#5,882,868
of 22,803,211 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#870
of 1,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,575
of 261,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,803,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,626 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.