↓ Skip to main content

Genomic medicine at the heart of diabetes management

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Genomic medicine at the heart of diabetes management
Published in
Diabetologia, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00125-015-3588-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark I. McCarthy

Abstract

Individual predisposition to type 2 diabetes is influenced by the combined effect of a constellation of genetic variants and a multitude of environmental exposures. Identification of the specific genetic variants involved, and the mechanisms through which they operate, provides a powerful approach for delivering biological insights that can drive translational benefit, one that is already widely exploited in the personalised management of monogenic and syndromic forms of diabetes. This commentary develops the argument that equivalent translational advances for more common forms of diabetes are unlikely to result solely from the ability to define more complete individual inventories of genetic risk and environmental exposure. They will also require identification of complex molecular signatures able to provide integrative, empirical, longitudinal readouts of disease progression. These signatures will track causal mechanisms and capture an individual's position within a complex spectrum of pathophysiological processes, thereby supporting personalised approaches to intervention and treatment. This is one of a series of commentaries under the banner '50 years forward', giving personal opinions on future perspectives in diabetes, to celebrate the 50th anniversary of Diabetologia (1965-2015).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 23%
Other 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Energy 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2015.
All research outputs
#5,238,549
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#2,109
of 5,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,801
of 279,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#28
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,376 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.