Title |
Psychometric performance of a generic walking scale (Walk-12G) in multiple sclerosis and Parkinson’s disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Neurology, September 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00415-011-6254-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Stina Bladh, Maria H. Nilsson, Gun-Marie Hariz, Albert Westergren, Jeremy Hobart, Peter Hagell |
Abstract |
Walking difficulties are common in neurological and other disorders, as well as among the elderly. There is a need for reliable and valid instruments for measuring walking difficulties in everyday life since existing gait tests are clinician rated and focus on situation specific capacity. The Walk-12G was adapted from the 12-item multiple sclerosis walking scale as a generic patient-reported rating scale for walking difficulties in everyday life. The aim of this study is to examine the psychometric properties of the Walk-12G in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) and Parkinson's disease (PD). The Walk-12G was translated into Swedish and evaluated qualitatively among 25 people with and without various neurological and other conditions. Postal survey (MS, n = 199; PD, n = 189) and clinical (PD, n = 36) data were used to test its psychometric properties. Respondents considered the Walk-12G relevant and easy to use. Mean completion time was 3.5 min. Data completeness was good (<5% missing item responses) and tests of scaling assumptions supported summing item scores to a total score (corrected item-total correlations >0.6). Coefficient alpha and test-retest reliabilities were >0.9, and standard errors of measurement were 2.3-2.8. Construct validity was supported by correlations in accordance with a priori expectations. Results are similar to those with previous Walk-12G versions, indicating that scale adaptation was successful. Data suggest that the Walk-12G meets rating scale criteria for clinical trials, making it a valuable complement to available gait tests. Further studies involving other samples and application of modern psychometric methods are warranted to examine the scale in more detail. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 74 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
Researcher | 9 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 12% |
Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
Other | 4 | 5% |
Other | 13 | 17% |
Unknown | 25 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 18% |
Neuroscience | 12 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 12% |
Sports and Recreations | 3 | 4% |
Psychology | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Unknown | 29 | 38% |