↓ Skip to main content

The surgical algorithm for the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
164 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
Title
The surgical algorithm for the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system
Published in
European Spine Journal, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00586-015-3982-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander R. Vaccaro, Gregory D. Schroeder, Christopher K. Kepler, F. Cumhur Oner, Luiz R. Vialle, Frank Kandziora, John D. Koerner, Mark F. Kurd, Max Reinhold, Klaus J. Schnake, Jens Chapman, Bizhan Aarabi, Michael G. Fehlings, Marcel F. Dvorak

Abstract

The goal of the current study is to establish a surgical algorithm to accompany the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system. A survey was sent to AOSpine members from the six AO regions of the world, and surgeons were asked if a patient should undergo an initial trial of conservative management or if surgical management was warranted. The survey consisted of controversial injury patterns. Using the results of the survey, a surgical algorithm was developed. The AOSpine Trauma Knowledge forum defined that the injuries in which less than 30 % of surgeons would recommend surgical intervention should undergo a trial of non-operative care, and injuries in which 70 % of surgeons would recommend surgery should undergo surgical intervention. Using these thresholds, it was determined that injuries with a thoracolumbar AOSpine injury score (TL AOSIS) of three or less should undergo a trial of conservative treatment, and injuries with a TL AOSIS of more than five should undergo surgical intervention. Operative or non-operative treatment is acceptable for injuries with a TL AOSIS of four or five. The current algorithm uses a meaningful injury classification and worldwide surgeon input to determine the initial treatment recommendation for thoracolumbar injuries. This allows for a globally accepted surgical algorithm for the treatment of thoracolumbar trauma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
Lebanon 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 184 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 34 18%
Researcher 22 12%
Student > Postgraduate 20 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 10%
Student > Master 15 8%
Other 39 21%
Unknown 40 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 111 59%
Neuroscience 9 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 59 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2022.
All research outputs
#6,146,947
of 23,330,477 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#698
of 4,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,797
of 265,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#16
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,330,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,749 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.