↓ Skip to main content

What are the most important tasks of tutors during the tutorials in hybrid problem-based learning curricula?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
Title
What are the most important tasks of tutors during the tutorials in hybrid problem-based learning curricula?
Published in
BMC Medical Education, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12909-015-0368-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruth Boelens, Bram De Wever, Yves Rosseel, Alain G Verstraete, Anselme Derese

Abstract

In problem-based learning, a tutor, the quality of the problems and group functioning play a central role in stimulating student learning. This study is conducted in a hybrid medical curriculum where problem-based learning is one of the pedagogical approaches. The aim of this study was to examine which tutor tasks are the most important during the tutorial sessions and thus should be promoted in hybrid (and in maybe all) problem-based learning curricula in higher education. A student (N = 333) questionnaire was used to obtain data about the problem-based learning process, combined with the achievement score of the students on a multiple-choice exam. Structural equation modeling was used to test the fit of different models (two existing models and a new simplified model) representing the factors of interest and their relationships, in order to determine which tutor characteristics are the most important in the present study. A new simplified model is presented, which demonstrates that stimulation of active and self-directed learning by tutors enhances the perceived case quality and the perceived group functioning. There was no significant effect between the stimulation of collaborative learning and perceived group functioning. In addition, group functioning was not a significant predictor for achievement. We found that stimulating active and self-directed learning are perceived as tutors' most important tasks with regard to perceived case quality and group functioning. It is necessary to train and teach tutors how they can stimulate active and self-directed learning by students.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Iraq 1 <1%
Unknown 115 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Lecturer 11 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 35 29%
Unknown 22 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 26%
Social Sciences 23 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Psychology 6 5%
Computer Science 6 5%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 27 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2016.
All research outputs
#7,458,462
of 22,803,211 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,345
of 3,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,783
of 264,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#17
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,803,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.