You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic review and meta-analysis of early goal-directed therapy for septic shock: the ARISE, ProCESS and ProMISe Investigators
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-015-3822-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
D. C. Angus, A. E. Barnato, D. Bell, R. Bellomo, C.-R. Chong, T. J. Coats, A. Davies, A. Delaney, D. A. Harrison, A. Holdgate, B. Howe, D. T. Huang, T. Iwashyna, J. A. Kellum, S. L. Peake, F. Pike, M. C. Reade, K. M. Rowan, M. Singer, S. A. R. Webb, L. A. Weissfeld, D. M. Yealy, J. D. Young |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 26% |
| United States | 3 | 9% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| Italy | 2 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 6% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 496 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 483 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 69 | 14% |
| Researcher | 65 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 57 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 57 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 11% |
| Other | 129 | 26% |
| Unknown | 66 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 340 | 69% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 32 | 6% |
| Unknown | 84 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2016.
All research outputs
#971,093
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#920
of 5,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,557
of 282,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#2
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.