↓ Skip to main content

Current understanding of invasive species impacts cannot be ignored: potential publication biases do not invalidate findings

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Current understanding of invasive species impacts cannot be ignored: potential publication biases do not invalidate findings
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10531-018-1527-9
Authors

Sara E. Kuebbing, Martin A. Nuñez

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 21%
Researcher 6 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Other 2 7%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 8 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 28%
Environmental Science 7 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 8 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2018.
All research outputs
#21,358,731
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#2,213
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#296,942
of 334,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#31
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.