↓ Skip to main content

Youth Functioning and Experiences in Inner-City After-School Programs Among Age, Gender, and Race Groups

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Child and Family Studies, March 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Youth Functioning and Experiences in Inner-City After-School Programs Among Age, Gender, and Race Groups
Published in
Journal of Child and Family Studies, March 2001
DOI 10.1023/a:1016681517546
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer G. Roffman, Maria E. Pagano, Barton J. Hirsch

Abstract

Many dangers and challenges face inner-city minority children during their after-school hours. Youth development programs provide an alternative to spending this time unsupervised. We examined the relationship between children's experiences in selected urban Boys and Girls Clubs and child functioning. Because the sample (N = 296) consisted of African American and Hispanic boys and girls, aged 10-18, we were able to compare these relationships across race, gender, and age groups. There was no relationship between simple participation levels and child functioning, but significant linkages were identified between specific elements of the club experience and functioning. Relationships with club staff members and participation in club activities were associated with better functioning for older boys, a subgroup that is at considerable risk for delinquency. In addition, enjoyment of the club and not feeling badly treated there were associated with better functioning for all groups of children.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 5%
Unknown 63 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 23%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Researcher 6 9%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 9 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 27 41%
Psychology 17 26%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 11 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2015.
All research outputs
#14,512,167
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Child and Family Studies
#882
of 1,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,575
of 41,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Child and Family Studies
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them