↓ Skip to main content

Spatial variation of phytoplankton community structure in Daya Bay, China

Overview of attention for article published in Ecotoxicology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Spatial variation of phytoplankton community structure in Daya Bay, China
Published in
Ecotoxicology, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10646-015-1471-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhao-Yu Jiang, You-Shao Wang, Hao Cheng, Jian-Dong Zhang, Jiao Fei

Abstract

Daya Bay is one of the largest and most important gulfs in the southern coast of China, in the northern part of the South China Sea. The phylogenetic diversity and spatial distribution of phytoplankton from the Daya Bay surface water and the relationship with the in situ water environment were investigated by the clone library of the large subunit of ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase (rbcL) gene. The dominant species of phytoplankton were diatoms and eustigmatophytes, which accounted for 81.9 % of all the clones of the rbcL genes. Prymnesiophytes were widely spread and wide varieties lived in Daya Bay, whereas the quantity was limited. The community structure of phytoplankton was shaped by pH and salinity and the concentration of silicate, phosphorus and nitrite. The phytoplankton biomass was significantly positively affected by phosphorus and nitrite but negatively by salinity and pH. Therefore, the phytoplankton distribution and biomass from Daya Bay were doubly affected by anthropic activities and natural factors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 7 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 33%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 14%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2015.
All research outputs
#15,383,020
of 24,383,935 outputs
Outputs from Ecotoxicology
#584
of 1,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,233
of 268,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecotoxicology
#13
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,383,935 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,528 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.