| Title |
Clinical significance of isolated mega cisterna magna
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, April 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00404-007-0369-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Etan Z. Zimmer, Lior Lowenstein, Moshe Bronshtein, Dorith Goldsher, Judith Aharon-Peretz |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 24% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 12% |
| Researcher | 4 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 18% |
| Unknown | 4 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 65% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 6% |
| Psychology | 2 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2015.
All research outputs
#5,894,850
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#348
of 2,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,437
of 73,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 73,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.