↓ Skip to main content

Functional Status Outperforms Comorbidities in Predicting Acute Care Readmissions in Medically Complex Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
25 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
Title
Functional Status Outperforms Comorbidities in Predicting Acute Care Readmissions in Medically Complex Patients
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11606-015-3350-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shirley L. Shih, Paul Gerrard, Richard Goldstein, Jacqueline Mix, Colleen M. Ryan, Paulette Niewczyk, Lewis Kazis, Jaye Hefner, D. Clay Ackerly, Ross Zafonte, Jeffrey C. Schneider

Abstract

To examine functional status versus medical comorbidities as predictors of acute care readmissions in medically complex patients. Retrospective database study. U.S. inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Subjects included 120,957 patients in the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation admitted to inpatient rehabilitation facilities under the medically complex impairment group code between 2002 and 2011. A Basic Model based on gender and functional status was developed using logistic regression to predict the odds of 3-, 7-, and 30-day readmission from inpatient rehabilitation facilities to acute care hospitals. Functional status was measured by the FIM(®) motor score. The Basic Model was compared to six other predictive models-three Basic Plus Models that added a comorbidity measure to the Basic Model and three Gender-Comorbidity Models that included only gender and a comorbidity measure. The three comorbidity measures used were the Elixhauser index, Deyo-Charlson index, and Medicare comorbidity tier system. The c-statistic was the primary measure of model performance. We investigated 3-, 7-, and 30-day readmission to acute care hospitals from inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Basic Model c-statistics predicting 3-, 7-, and 30-day readmissions were 0.69, 0.64, and 0.65, respectively. The best-performing Basic Plus Model (Basic+Elixhauser) c-statistics were only 0.02 better than the Basic Model, and the best-performing Gender-Comorbidity Model (Gender+Elixhauser) c-statistics were more than 0.07 worse than the Basic Model. Readmission models based on functional status consistently outperform models based on medical comorbidities. There is opportunity to improve current national readmission risk models to more accurately predict readmissions by incorporating functional data.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 105 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Master 10 9%
Other 8 7%
Other 27 25%
Unknown 25 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 21%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Psychology 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 30 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2016.
All research outputs
#988,802
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#844
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,630
of 266,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#13
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.