↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of the relationship between coronal and sagittal deformities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Analysis of the relationship between coronal and sagittal deformities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Published in
European Spine Journal, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00586-015-3986-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Panpan Hu, Miao Yu, Xiao Liu, Bin Zhu, Xiaoguang Liu, Zhongjun Liu

Abstract

To characterize the sagittal alignment of each Lenke type and investigate the relationship between coronal and sagittal deformities in adolescent idiopathic scoliotic (AIS) patients. A cohort of 184 subjects with AIS was retrospectively recruited. Radiographic data were measured and collected, including the Lenke types, Cobb angles of structural curves, and sagittal spino-pelvic parameters. Subjects were grouped according to their genders, Lenke curve types, lumbar modifiers and the amount of coronal structural curves. The sagittal alignment was then compared between the different groups, and correlation analysis was also taken between coronal and sagittal parameters. Besides, each subject's Roussouly type was decided and its distribution was compared among different Lenke types. The cohort included 59 males and 125 females, averagely aged at 15.5 ± 3.3 years old. Most sagittal parameters except thoracic kyphosis (TK) and pelvic tilt (PT) were similar among different Lenke types, while all the sagittal parameters were similar between males and females. The groups with different lumbar modifiers had similar sagittal parameters except TK, which was also true for the groups with different amounts of coronal curves. 42.4 % of the cohort belonged to Roussouly type 3, and the distribution of Roussouly types was comparable among all Lenke types. All sagittal parameters except C7 translation ratio were significantly different among Roussouly types (P < 0.05). Correlation analysis showed that main thoracic (MT) was negatively correlated with lumbar lordosis (LL, r = -0.324), sacral slope (r = -0.321) and spino-sacral angle (r = -0.363). Partial correlation analysis found that thoracolumbar/lumbar was negatively correlated with TK (r = -0.464) and LL (r = -0.422) when MT was controlled. The influence of coronal deformity on sagittal parameters was limited and mainly reflected in the deviation of TK. Most coronal and sagittal parameters were not significantly correlated, and the coronal deformity types did not change the global sagittal postural patterns.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Lebanon 2 4%
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 48 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 13%
Other 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 14 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 17 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2016.
All research outputs
#14,742,867
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#1,909
of 4,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,381
of 263,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#33
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,599 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.