↓ Skip to main content

Students’ reflections on the relationships between safe learning environments, learning challenge and positive experiences of learning in a simulated GP clinic

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Health Sciences Education, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
Title
Students’ reflections on the relationships between safe learning environments, learning challenge and positive experiences of learning in a simulated GP clinic
Published in
Advances in Health Sciences Education, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10459-015-9611-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. E. Young, M. I. Williamson, T. G. Egan

Abstract

Learning environments are a significant determinant of student behaviour, achievement and satisfaction. In this article we use students' reflective essays to identify key features of the learning environment that contributed to positive and transformative learning experiences. We explore the relationships between these features, the students' sense of safety in the learning environment (LE), the resulting learning challenge with which they could cope and their positive reports of the experience itself. Our students worked in a unique simulation of General Practice, the Safe and Effective Clinical Outcomes clinic, where they consistently reported positive experiences of learning. We analysed 77 essays from 2011 and 2012 using an immersion/crystallisation framework. Half of the students referred to the safety of the learning environment spontaneously. Students described deep learning experiences in their simulated consultations. Students valued features of the LE which contributed to a psychologically safe environment. Together with the provision of constructive support and immediate, individualised feedback this feeling of safety assisted students to find their own way through clinical dilemmas. These factors combine to make students feel relaxed and able to take on challenges that otherwise would have been overwhelming. Errors became learning opportunities and students could practice purposefully. We draw on literature from medical education, educational psychology and sociology to interpret our findings. Our results demonstrate relationships between safe learning environments, learning challenge and powerful learning experiences, justifying close attention to the construction of learning environments to promote student learning, confidence and motivation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 152 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 16%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Researcher 12 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 39 25%
Unknown 42 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 11%
Social Sciences 14 9%
Psychology 6 4%
Arts and Humanities 4 3%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 53 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2018.
All research outputs
#5,057,835
of 24,855,923 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Health Sciences Education
#223
of 927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,498
of 269,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Health Sciences Education
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,855,923 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.