↓ Skip to main content

Normaldruckhydrozephalus

Overview of attention for article published in Die Radiologie, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Normaldruckhydrozephalus
Published in
Die Radiologie, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00117-014-2797-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

J.M. Lieb, C. Stippich, F.J. Ahlhelm

Abstract

Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is a disorder found mainly in the elderly (> 60 years) with an increasing prevalence with age and is one of the few treatable causes of dementia. If untreated NPH often leads to severe motor, psychomotor and irreversible cognitive deficits. The pathogenesis is not yet fully understood. Clinical symptoms consist of the (not always complete) classical triad of equilibrium and gait disturbances followed later by incontinence and dementia. Symptoms often show a gradual progression to irreversibility in non-treated patients; therefore, early diagnosis and treatment are mandatory. Important differential diagnoses are Parkinson's disease (similar gait), Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia, not least due to the high comorbidity of these conditions with NPH. The standard radiological method for evaluation of NPH is conventional cross-sectional imaging that typically shows ventriculomegaly (Evans' index > 0.3 and cella media index < 4) often combined with the so-called disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus (DESH) pattern (tight convexity sulci and enlarged sylvian fissure). These findings should be differentiated from ventriculomegaly in atrophy combined with enlarged convexity sulci. Special magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques can be used to evaluate cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow but are not yet part of the diagnostic guidelines. Combined with cross-sectional imaging, well-established clinical and invasive diagnostic tests, such as repeated spinal tap or lumbar drainage with re-evaluation of clinical symptoms lead to a diagnosis and help with preoperative patient selection for CSF diversion. Ventriculoperitoneal CSF shunting has proven to be safe and is the only known successful therapy for NPH.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 27%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Other 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 53%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2015.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Die Radiologie
#147
of 326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,333
of 278,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Die Radiologie
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 326 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.