↓ Skip to main content

Density-dependent regulatory mechanisms of the generative potency in the males of a bank voleMyodes glareolus

Overview of attention for article published in Mammal Research, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Density-dependent regulatory mechanisms of the generative potency in the males of a bank voleMyodes glareolus
Published in
Mammal Research, June 2008
DOI 10.1007/bf03194250
Authors

Vera Mamina, Oleg Zhigalsky

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 50%
Student > Master 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2015.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Mammal Research
#606
of 875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,698
of 97,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mammal Research
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.