↓ Skip to main content

Antral Follicle Priming Before Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection in Previously Diagnosed Low Responders: A Randomized Controlled Trial (FOLLPRIM).

Overview of attention for article published in JCEM, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antral Follicle Priming Before Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection in Previously Diagnosed Low Responders: A Randomized Controlled Trial (FOLLPRIM).
Published in
JCEM, May 2015
DOI 10.1210/jc.2015-1194
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alicia Marzal Escriva, Cesar Diaz-Garcia, Mercedes Monterde, José María Rubio, Antonio Pellicer

Abstract

Low response to controlled ovarian stimulation (COH) implies a reduced number of embryos and impaired pregnancy rate. Follicular priming with steroids prior to COH has been suggested to improve the subsequent ovarian response. To determine the best follicular priming protocol in low responders and to investigate the intrafollicular mechanisms triggered by steroid-hormone priming. Single center, randomized, parallel, open-label, controlled trial, in two phases. University-based IVF Unit. Potential low responders (n=99) underwent a first ICSI cycle. Confirmed low responders (n=66) were randomized to different priming protocols prior to a new ICSI. Randomized patients underwent one of the following priming strategies: transdermal testosterone (T:20 μ g/kg/day), transdermal estradiol (E:200 μ g/day) or combined oral contraceptive pills (EOCP:30 μ g of ethinyl-estradiol plus 150 μ g of desogestrel administered during the luteal phase of two consecutive cycles) and 4 mg/day of estradiol valerate during the follicular phase between them. Metaphase II (MII) oocytes retrieved. Gene expression in granulosa cells of steroidogenesis enzymes and the following receptors: FSH, LH and androgen. The number of retrieved MII didn't differ between interventional groups (T:2.2±2.0; E:2.7±1.7; EOCP:2.0±1.3; n.s). When compared to non-primed cycles, estradiol pretreatment yielded more MII oocytes (Primed:2.7±1.7; Non-primed:1.6±1.2; p=0.029) although clinical pregnancy rate was higher in patients treated with testosterone (p=0.003). Testosterone pre-treatment increased androgen receptor expression (p=0.028) when compared to the previous cycle without priming. the results of the present trial do not support the superiority of one priming strategy over the others.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 24%
Other 7 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 10 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 15 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2015.
All research outputs
#20,660,571
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from JCEM
#13,737
of 15,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,394
of 279,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JCEM
#110
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,434 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.