↓ Skip to main content

Differential regulation of NF-κB activation and function by topoisomerase II inhibitors

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, April 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Differential regulation of NF-κB activation and function by topoisomerase II inhibitors
Published in
BMC Cancer, April 2006
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-6-101
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kirsteen J Campbell, John M O'Shea, Neil D Perkins

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 23%
Student > Master 5 19%
Researcher 5 19%
Other 2 8%
Professor 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 19%
Psychology 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 6 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2016.
All research outputs
#15,331,767
of 22,803,211 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#4,106
of 8,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,999
of 66,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#21
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,803,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,297 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.