↓ Skip to main content

Ectopic expression of GroEL from Xenorhabdus nematophila in tomato enhances resistance against Helicoverpa armigera and salt and thermal stress

Overview of attention for article published in Transgenic Research, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Ectopic expression of GroEL from Xenorhabdus nematophila in tomato enhances resistance against Helicoverpa armigera and salt and thermal stress
Published in
Transgenic Research, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11248-015-9881-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Punam Kumari, Gagan Kumar Mahapatro, Nirupama Banerjee, Neera Bhalla Sarin

Abstract

The GroEL homolog XnGroEL protein of Xenorhabdus nematophila belongs to a highly conserved family of molecular chaperones/heat shock proteins (Hsps). XnGroEL was shown to possess oral insecticidal activity against a major crop pest Helicoverpa armigera. Under normal conditions, the Hsps/chaperones facilitate folding, assembly, and translocation of cellular proteins, while in stress conditions they protect proteins from denaturation. In this study, we describe generation of transgenic tomato plants overexpressing insecticidal XnGroEL protein and their tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses. Presence of XnGroEL in the transgenic tomato lines conferred resistance against H. armigera showing 100 % (p ≤ 0.001) mortality of neonates. In addition, XnGroEL provided thermotolerance and protection against high salt concentration to the tomato plants. Expression of XnGroEL minimized photo-oxidation of chlorophyll and reduced oxidative damage of cell membrane system of the plants under heat and salt stress. The enhanced tolerance to abiotic stresses correlated with increase in the anti-oxidative enzyme activity and reduced H2O2 accumulation in transgenic tomato plants. The variety of beneficial properties displayed by XnGroEL protein provides an opportunity for value addition and improvement of crop productivity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 17%
Student > Master 3 17%
Lecturer 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 6 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 17%
Engineering 2 11%
Unspecified 1 6%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2016.
All research outputs
#14,810,408
of 22,803,211 outputs
Outputs from Transgenic Research
#703
of 890 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,492
of 263,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transgenic Research
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,803,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 890 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.