You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome-wide association study identifies a new melanoma susceptibility locus at 1q21.3
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ng.958 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stuart MacGregor, Grant W Montgomery, Jimmy Z Liu, Zhen Zhen Zhao, Anjali K Henders, Mitchell Stark, Helen Schmid, Elizabeth A Holland, David L Duffy, Mingfeng Zhang, Jodie N Painter, Dale R Nyholt, Judith A Maskiell, Jodie Jetann, Megan Ferguson, Anne E Cust, Mark A Jenkins, David C Whiteman, Håkan Olsson, Susana Puig, Giovanna Bianchi-Scarrà, Johan Hansson, Florence Demenais, Maria Teresa Landi, Tadeusz Dębniak, Rona Mackie, Esther Azizi, Brigitte Bressac-de Paillerets, Alisa M Goldstein, Peter A Kanetsky, Nelleke A Gruis, David E Elder, Julia A Newton-Bishop, D Timothy Bishop, Mark M Iles, Per Helsing, Christopher I Amos, Qingyi Wei, Li-E Wang, Jeffrey E Lee, Abrar A Qureshi, Richard F Kefford, Graham G Giles, Bruce K Armstrong, Joanne F Aitken, Jiali Han, John L Hopper, Jeffrey M Trent, Kevin M Brown, Nicholas G Martin, Graham J Mann, Nicholas K Hayward |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 137 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 35 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 22% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 7% |
| Professor | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 19% |
| Unknown | 24 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 50 | 34% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 16% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 25 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2011.
All research outputs
#13,123,643
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#6,500
of 7,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,318
of 136,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#60
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.9. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.