↓ Skip to main content

Progressive climate change and disasters: island perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Progressive climate change and disasters: island perspectives
Published in
Natural Hazards, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11069-013-0721-z
Authors

Ilan Kelman, Shabana Khan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 58 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 20%
Student > Bachelor 10 17%
Student > Master 9 15%
Researcher 5 8%
Lecturer 3 5%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 17 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 16 27%
Social Sciences 13 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 16 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2013.
All research outputs
#20,271,607
of 22,803,211 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#1,676
of 1,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,527
of 196,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#20
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,803,211 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.