↓ Skip to main content

Religious Relationships with the Environment in a Tibetan Rural Community: Interactions and Contrasts with Popular Notions of Indigenous Environmentalism

Overview of attention for article published in Human Ecology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
Title
Religious Relationships with the Environment in a Tibetan Rural Community: Interactions and Contrasts with Popular Notions of Indigenous Environmentalism
Published in
Human Ecology, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10745-015-9742-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emily Woodhouse, Martin A. Mills, Philip J. K. McGowan, E. J. Milner-Gulland

Abstract

Representations of Green Tibetans connected to Buddhism and indigenous wisdom have been deployed by a variety of actors and persist in popular consciousness. Through interviews, participatory mapping and observation, we explored how these ideas relate to people's notions about the natural environment in a rural community on the Eastern Tibetan plateau, in Sichuan Province, China. We found people to be orienting themselves towards the environment by means of three interlinked religious notions: (1) local gods and spirits in the landscape, which have become the focus of conservation efforts in the form of 'sacred natural sites;' (2) sin and karma related to killing animals and plants; (3) Buddhist moral precepts especially non-violence. We highlight the gaps between externally generated representations and local understandings, but also the dynamic, contested and plural nature of local relationships with the environment, which have been influenced and reshaped by capitalist development and commodification of natural resources, state environmental policies, and Buddhist modernist ideas.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 2%
Australia 1 <1%
Nepal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 107 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 20%
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 37 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 24 21%
Environmental Science 18 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Arts and Humanities 7 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 4%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 40 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2018.
All research outputs
#6,229,690
of 24,833,004 outputs
Outputs from Human Ecology
#271
of 811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,765
of 269,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Ecology
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,833,004 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.